• ES
  • EN
Fundeps
  • About Fundeps
  • Team
  • Working areas
    • Environment
    • Democracy
    • Gender
    • Global Gorvernance
    • Health
  • News
  • Publications
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Environment, News

We present observations to the “good practices” of agrochemical application

The Final Report of the Interministerial Working Group on Good Practices in the Field of Phytosanitary Applications was submitted to public consultation from July 20 to August 20. From FUNDEPS we present our observations and objections to it.

“Below, we offer a google translate version of the original article in Spanish. This translation may not be accurate but serves as a general presentation of the article. For more accurate information, please switch to the Spanish version of the website. In addition, feel free to directly contact in English the person mentioned at the bottom of this article with regards to this topic”.

Through Joint Resolution No. 1/2018, the Ministries of Agribusiness and Environment and Sustainable Development of the Nation created an Interministerial Working Group on Good Practices in the Field of Phytosanitary Applications.
The objectives of the working group were:
• Elaborate the principles for ordering national public policies on phytosanitary applications, especially in buffer zones, and
• Make recommendations regarding how to improve the adoption, control and monitoring of good practices in the application of phytosanitary products.

The Working Group is made up of representatives of both ministries, the National Service of Agrifood Health and Quality (SENASA) and the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), who had two representatives each. In addition, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation, the Federal Council of the Environment (COFEMA) and the Federal Agricultural Council (CFA), who participated with only one representative, formed a part. He met six times between April 5 and July 5, 2018.

The final result was a document that proposes 12 principles and 23 recommendations, which was open to public consultation for a month through a web platform with consultative status. The participation of the society was very low, only 180 people left settled their contributions, which accounts for the little publicity that was given to the report and the public consultation carried out by both ministries.

From FUNDEPS we make some considerations and objections to the document, including:
– The Interministerial Working Group is composed mostly of representatives of agriculture;
– Absence of participation in the work process of qualified technical professionals, universities, NGOs and civil society in general.
– The need for a law as a public health issue is not analyzed;

– It is not taken into account that sprays can not be controlled. No matter how much “good agricultural practices” are adopted and climatic conditions are taken into account, the chemical products that are used have persistence in the environment and are mobilized through water and air even after the application is made;
– There is no clarity regarding the technical criteria that would be used to delimit the “buffer zones”, nor how they would be respected;
– The carrying out of epidemiological surveys from the Ministry of Health is not effectively ensured in order to know the situation of the populations near cultivation areas;
– It does not consider the principles of the General Environmental Law No. 25,675 that governs any national environmental policy, in particular the principles of prevention and precaution;
– It does not contemplate an inescindible sanctioning regime to the control and monitoring of “good agricultural practices”, among others.
One of the proposals presented in the report is to promote a national law on the application of phytosanitary products, complementary to the regulation on product registration and the law on empty pesticide containers. From FUNDEPS we support the enactment of a national law of minimum budgets referred to the application of agrochemicals guided by the precautionary principle and to establish a reference framework that protects the fundamental rights to the environment, health and quality of life of people .

More information:

Observaciones al informe sobre buenas prácticas en aplicaciones de Fitosanitarios

Grupo_Interministerial_Fitosanitarios

Authors:

Lourdes Aparicio, Juan Bautista López y María Pérez Alsina

Contact:

María Pérez Alsina – mariaperezalsina@fundeps.org

3 de September de 2018
Tags: Health
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
0 0 Comunicaciones Fundeps https://fundeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/logo-2026-300x120.png Comunicaciones Fundeps2018-09-03 02:50:482024-06-30 16:03:08We present observations to the “good practices” of agrochemical application
You might also like
What is happening with the labeling law?
“Contains” half a sanction in the front food labeling law
Healthy Eating Promotion Law: Responsibilities of entities and sectors involved in the marketing chain
Fundeps is part of the Alliance for the Framework Convention on Global Health
HLAC presented a report to the IACHR on HR and companies
Report on the human rights situation in Argentina before the IACHR
The Court of Colombia removed a censorship on a pro-health campaign
Tobacco Control Framework Convention – Infographic 1

Tags

Access to Information Access to Justice BID Chinese Investments Citizen Participation Democracy ENTs Environment Environmental Democracy Gender Global Governance Health Healthy nutrition IFIs Infrastructure Financing Legal Interruption of Pregnancy Sexual and Reproductive Rights Social and Environmental Standards Tobacco Control Transparency
See all tags

Acuerdo de Escazú

Emergencia Agroquímica

MOCI - monitoreo ciudadano en proyectos de infraestructura

{el entramado} Contamos historias. Acercamos Realidades.

Instagram

fundepsargentina

Trabajamos para que se garanticen los derechos humanos 🌱⚖️🗣️🌈💜🚭🍎
Promovemos la equidad de #genero, el derecho a la #salud y un #ambiente sano.

Hay ideas que escuchamos tantas veces que a veces Hay ideas que escuchamos tantas veces que a veces ni nos detenemos a pensarlas.

¿Los celos son una forma de cuidado? ¿El silencio significa consentimiento? ¿Poner límites puede arruinar una relación?

Salimos a la calle con una consigna simple: 👍 o 👎
Pero lo más interesante vino después: escuchar por qué.

Porque hablar de ESI también es revisar lo que pensamos sobre los vínculos, el consentimiento, los límites y el cuidado.

¿Vos qué pulgar levantarías?

#CrecíConESI #20AñosDeESI
🫂 El derecho a cuidar, a cuidarnos y a recibir cui 🫂 El derecho a cuidar, a cuidarnos y a recibir cuidados. El acceso a la salud integral con perspectiva de diversidad.

Compartimos un ateneo en el Hospital Aurelio Crespo, de Cruz del Eje, junto a 30 promotoras de salud que abarcan con su trabajo un territorio habitado por alrededor de 500 familias.

🏥Durante el encuentro, reflexionamos sobre lo que implica una «comunidad sana», las desigualdades estructurales que afectan a diferentes poblaciones y conceptos centrales para comprender la diversidad. También abordamos los acompañamientos, las responsabilidades de cada sector y las barreras que persisten para garantizar el acceso a derechos, especialmente en las zonas rurales.

La actividad se realizó en el marco del programa Familia rural sana y de la diplomatura que las promotoras cursan en articulación con la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de la UNC.

Agradecemos la invitación y la oportunidad de seguir construyendo colectivamente el acceso a la salud integral en el norte de Córdoba.

En el Día Internacional de los Cuidados y el Apoyo, reivindicamos la tarea, muchas veces invisibilizada, que sostienen las promotoras de salud en los distintos territorios de la provincia.
¿Cómo se traduce una ley en la vida cotidiana? ¿Qu ¿Cómo se traduce una ley en la vida cotidiana? ¿Qué aprendizajes nos dejó la ESI en estos 20 años?

A 20 años de la Ley de Educación Sexual Integral, salimos a las calles para conocer qué huellas dejó la ESI, qué nos hubiera gustado aprender antes y qué conversaciones siguen pendientes.

Lo que aprendemos sobre nuestros cuerpos, nuestros vínculos y nuestros derechos también cambia la forma en que nos relacionamos, ponemos límites y tomamos decisiones. ¿Qué lugar tuvo la ESI en tu vida?

#CrecíConESI #ESI20Años
Post pluri seguimos trabajando. Nos encontramos du Post pluri seguimos trabajando. Nos encontramos durante dos días con compañeres de diferentes organizaciones del país, con quienes articulamos diferentes acciones en torno a la agenda de salud sexual y reproductiva 
Nos tenemos! 💜
Follow on Instagram

Twitter

Tweets por @fundeps

Newsletter Subscription

    Fundeps. Córdoba (CP X5000JZH), Argentina. info@fundeps.org
    • Link to X
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Mail
    • Link to Youtube
    • Link to LinkedIn
    • Link to TikTok
    Link to: New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin America Link to: New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin America New analysis on regulations in development institutions present in Latin Am... Link to: The right to Public Education in the crosshairs Link to: The right to Public Education in the crosshairs The right to Public Education in the crosshairs
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top